From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: Re: Merge commit subjects git.git Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:10:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20100719141057.GA13051@vidovic> References: <201007181733.59704.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Thomas Rast , Jay Soffian , Junio C Hamano , git , Nicolas Sebrecht To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 19 16:11:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oar3o-00070W-LT for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:11:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934163Ab0GSOLI convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:11:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:45510 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933763Ab0GSOLD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:11:03 -0400 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so4420526wyb.19 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:11:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=mquSgpxPVJ2o/rKSEro4IPXmGPlcbSM7S9k3gcxIeL4=; b=xW59b2P8wHbcjbGCsKUUzXPc1bjyQhuRi9not8MVghXRaSQ4Us5J8FGBjeAPKbadn/ 3yIfav38sAglWzY/JDZLSMLXS09kJBhE10JLOCEM7azl9alCA6pk6y3W3EmZEzRUvHGy Tl+74e2fXGSnOfnJ12/ry34ITwWG3/j3scDVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kPvHpYP3cCdydlySXP5ZTJJSt7skRFfLPR5v0l6YAW3J7G+zFZ9Wvrrh+Ua07B3Anp JI1HpUuAnzqalv9J9gYj6u0fxXxD/N2OCi0Vl4D9BBvhFtyYJtT9eImM+SPfBryH/SvH J3sDTKzGug/vruklQN9JGfySR3Q2xsmik4ovE= Received: by 10.227.134.202 with SMTP id k10mr4137661wbt.17.1279548660931; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vidovic (aqu33-8-83-155-187-36.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.187.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm2294407wed.25.2010.07.19.07.10.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: The 18/07/10, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:33, Thomas Rast wr= ote: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0if (!strcmp("master", current_branch)) >=20 > Wow, I thought the only place where we gave "master" any special > meaning was in that we create it as the default branch. Can't we fix > this to be less hard-coded? To talk about pros and cons I wonder what would be the benefits of changing this. I guess most projects probably best keeping the history consistent for all the merge commit messages. I think this is more sensible than giving the same behaviour /across/ different repositories (for only which not following the "master" convention). --=20 Nicolas Sebrecht