From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: skillzero@gmail.com
Cc: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>,
"Marc Branchaud" <marcnarc@xiplink.com>,
"Jens Lehmann" <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Bryan Larsen" <bryan.larsen@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:56:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007261056.58985.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinhd2DYh7WXzMvhMkqp98fYtTWWuQi0RSL9Rome@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010, skillzero@gmail.com napisał:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Honest question: do you care about the wasted disk space and download
> > time for these extra files? Or just the fact that git gets slow when
> > you have them?
>
> I have the similar situation to the original poster (huge trees) and
> for me it's all three: disk space, download time, and performance. My
> tree has a few relatively small (< 20 MB) shared directories of common
> code, a few large (2-6 GB) directories of code for OS's, and then
> several medium size (< 500 MB) directories for application code. The
> application developers only care about the app+shared directories (and
> are very annoyed by the massive space and performance impact of the OS
> directories). The firmware-only developers only care about OS+shared
> and are mildly annoyed by the medium space and performance impact of
> the app directories. I work on all of the pieces, but even I would
> prefer to have things separated so when I work on the apps, git
> status/etc doesn't take a big hit for close to a million files in the
> OS directories (particularly when doing git status on Windows). Even
> when using the -uno option to git status, it's still pretty slow (over
> a minute).
>
> git-submodule might be technically possible in this situation, but
> having to commit and push each submodule and then commit and push the
> super module makes it slightly worse than just dealing with the
> space/download/performance issues of one huge repository.
But this is just a matter for improving UI for dealing with submodules,
isn't it. For example having "git commit --recursive" would help
with 'having to commit each submodule', though how you would write commit
messages then: perhaps supermodule commit message could be by default
composed out of submodules commits (if any). "git push --recursive"
(or some support for push in "git remote") would help with 'having to
push each submodule'.
Isn't it?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 17:15 Avery Pennarun's git-subtree? Bryan Larsen
2010-07-21 19:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-21 19:56 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 20:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-21 21:09 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 21:20 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-21 22:46 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-22 1:09 ` Avery Pennarun
[not found] ` <m31vavn8la.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
2010-07-22 18:23 ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-24 22:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-22 19:41 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-22 19:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-22 20:06 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-22 20:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-22 21:33 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:10 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-26 17:34 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-07-22 20:43 ` Elijah Newren
2010-07-22 21:32 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 8:31 ` Chris Webb
2010-07-23 8:40 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:11 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 22:33 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-23 15:13 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 15:10 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 16:05 ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-23 17:11 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 19:01 ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-23 22:32 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-25 19:57 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-27 18:40 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 21:14 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-23 15:19 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-23 22:50 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-24 0:58 ` skillzero
2010-07-24 1:20 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-24 19:40 ` skillzero
2010-07-25 1:47 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-07-28 22:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-26 13:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-26 16:37 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-26 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-26 17:36 ` Bryan Larsen
2010-07-26 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-27 18:28 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-27 20:57 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-27 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-27 21:32 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-07-26 8:56 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-07-27 18:36 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-28 13:36 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-28 18:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-24 20:07 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-07-26 8:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-27 19:15 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-07-26 15:15 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-07-21 23:46 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007261056.58985.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bryan.larsen@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=skillzero@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).