From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: jk/tag-contains: stalled Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:36:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20100805173635.GA15760@sigill> References: <7v62zqf23s.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100805001629.GC2901@thunk.org> <7vsk2tdnv5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vhbj9dm6h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Ted Ts'o , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 05 19:36:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4N5-0008Q3-TZ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:36:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755750Ab0HERgm (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:36:42 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:54146 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388Ab0HERgl (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:36:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 29611 invoked by uid 111); 5 Aug 2010 17:36:39 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (129.79.255.116) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:36:39 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:36:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vhbj9dm6h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:05:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >>> * jk/tag-contains (2010-07-05) 4 commits > >>> - Why is "git tag --contains" so slow? > >>> - default core.clockskew variable to one day > >>> - limit "contains" traversals based on commit timestamp > >>> - tag: speed up --contains calculation > [...] > > I agree in principle; the log messages need to be cleaned up first > > at the least, though. > > To reduce the risk of double-work, I need to clarify. > > I meant to say that I can find enough material, especially what Peff > wrote, in the discussion that followed in the thread to do the clean-up > myself. No need to resend by anybody unless there are material > differences from what have been discussed so far that need to be > incorporated in the final series. The only bad log message should be the final one, which should be dropped anyway. I would recommend just merging the first two for now, and Ted can tweak his core.clockskew manually. -Peff