Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] t5520-pull: Add testcases showing spurious conflicts from git pull --rebase

[Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>]

On Sonntag, 8. August 2010, Elijah Newren wrote:
> +test_expect_success 'setup for detecting upstreamed changes' '
> +	mkdir src &&
> +	(cd src &&
> +	 git init &&
> +	 for i in $(seq 1 10); do echo $i; done > stuff &&

We don't have seq on Windows. The sequence is short enough to list it 
explicitly.

> +	 git add stuff &&
> +	 git commit -m "Initial revision"
> +	) &&
> +	git clone src dst &&
> +	(cd src &&
> +	 perl -pi -e s/5/43/ stuff &&

perl -pi is no better than sed -i; it does not work on Windows because it 
tries to remove an open file (and that is a no-go on Windows). perl -pi.bak 
does work though.

> +	 git commit -a -m "5->43" &&
> +	 perl -pi -e s/6/42/ stuff &&
> +	 git commit -a -m "Make it bigger" &&
> +	 correct=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
> +	) &&

This assignment at the end of the subshell is pointless.

> +test_expect_success 'setup for avoiding reapplying old patches' '
> +	(cd dst &&
> +	 (git rebase --abort || true) &&

Perhaps:

	test_might_fail git rebase --abort &&

but I'm not sure whether that's the intended use of test_might_fail.

> +	 git reset --hard origin/master
> +	) &&
...
> +test_expect_failure 'git pull --rebase does not reapply old patches' '
> +	(cd dst &&
> +	 (git pull --rebase || true) &&

Ditto.

> +	 test 1 = $(find .git/rebase-apply -name "000*" | wc -l)
> +	)
> +'
> +
>  test_done

-- Hannes