From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Git thinks a failing command doesn't exist Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20100811194841.GA8689@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20100811192554.GA8106@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 11 21:48:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHIB-00040T-C1 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:48:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758436Ab0HKTsp convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:45 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:56085 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756390Ab0HKTsp (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 6643 invoked by uid 111); 11 Aug 2010 19:48:44 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:48:44 +0000 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:45:14PM +0000, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 = Bjarmason wrote: > > So either your shell is producing that exit code for a different ca= se, > > or git is broken. >=20 > My shell is Debian /bin/dash 0.5.5.1-6. Hmm, I can't reproduce here, and I am also using dash as my shell. > Unfortunately the error with rebase was some one-off thing that I > couldn't reproduce. I'm not even sure /what/ I did to make it happen. OK. The code is _supposed_ to work as you expected, so if it happens again, I guess try to reproduce and we'll go from there. -Peff