From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink Subject: Re: Bug report: %h for abbreviated hashes broken after 1.7.1 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20100825061643.GB2938@atjola.homenet> References: <20100825041440.GH11619@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Todd A. Jacobs" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 25 08:16:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo9I6-0006Vw-II for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:16:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752039Ab0HYGQt convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:16:49 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:42949 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751380Ab0HYGQs (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:16:48 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2010 06:16:46 -0000 Received: from i59F5723D.versanet.de (EHLO atjola.homenet) [89.245.114.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 08:16:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5039886 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/DnTBUBaDD8XBQuJW1LOlVokQgqMbHPHzjHVd4G5 my7qdKUgxTEjfd Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: [Added Jonathan back to Cc...] On 2010.08.25 01:07:28 -0400, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > $ git log --oneline v1.7.2.2..35039ced9296786bc0971bf5385c0d6f6ea5e= a1e > > 35039ce archive: abbreviate substituted commit ids again That shows that the commit is not in the tag's ancestry. > Tag v1.7.2.2 is almost a month after 35039ce, so I'm not sure where > you're going with that, either. It should definitely be part of the > 1.7.2.2 tarball, but the problem persists. Maybe it should be, but it isn't. With non-linear histories, commit dates don't tell you whether one commit is an ancestor of another commit. Bj=F6rn