From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Tags only shown on log with --decorate? Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20100909211443.GA3096@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20100909194823.GB1146@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Carlos Eduardo da Fonseca X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 09 23:14:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtoS5-0007ek-NX for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:14:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755086Ab0IIVOc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:14:32 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:59609 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753727Ab0IIVOc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:14:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 21696 invoked by uid 111); 9 Sep 2010 21:14:30 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:14:30 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:14:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:36:09PM -0300, Carlos Eduardo da Fonseca wrote: > Well, I don't see how can it distract people, but I find important to > developers who clone/pull a repository to immediatly see what were the > tags added and what are they relation with commits when they "git > log". > I wouldn't (and I think most developers also wouldn't) remember to > execute "git tag" or use the "--decorate" parameter every time they > clone/pull something. Right. That's why we have a config option, as I explained in my other mail. If you want to argue that the config option should default to on, submit a patch. Either it will get accepted, or it will generate lots of responses from people who disagree with you. -Peff