From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] blame,cat-file: Demonstrate --textconv is wrongly running converter on symlinks Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20100921204312.GC395@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <3c344d9b8f014ccb96dc37dc42668426fb5a3c30.1285013802.git.kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> <20100921183959.GB4390@landau.phys.spbu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Kirill Smelkov , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Axel Bonnet , =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Poulain , Diane Gasselin To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 21 22:43:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy9gM-00011D-Fq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:43:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754613Ab0IUUnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:13 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:58458 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754407Ab0IUUnM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 11563 invoked by uid 111); 21 Sep 2010 20:43:12 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:43:12 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:18:11PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > This note clearly says "git diff is not affected, that's why we don't > > write new tests for it". > > I disagree with the implication. Git diff is not affected because it > was done right, but behaving correctly doesn't mean you don't need > tests. Checking the behavior of diff with tests wouldn't harm (but > that's not serious not to do it). Actually, there is some breakage in "git diff" with userdiffs, just not for textconv (but the fix covers both, so the problem is sort of a superset). I'm about to send a patch that has some tests, so don't worry about them for this series. -Peff