From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "Štěpán Němec" <stepnem@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Advertising the Git User's Survey 2010 - report
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 11:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010031146.43883.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878w2h2yhu.fsf@gmail.com>
Dnia sobota 2. października 2010 03:07, Štěpán Němec napisał:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 9/30/10, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Are there channels that should be utilized missing from the above list?
>>>> How next year Git User's Survey 2011 (if there would be one) should be
>>>> announced?
>>>
>>> From the report, 77% answers question 21 as "this is my first survey",
>>> I think you have done a fantastic job.
>>
>> That, or (more likely) these people have started to seriously look at git
>> within the past year. There doesn't seem to be a more direct "How long
>> have you been using git?" question, but look at #22 as a proxy. 54% of
>> the people answer they cannot compare the current version of git and the
>> one from one year ago.
Hmmm... such question was removed from the survey, but perhaps we should
re-introduce it, perhaps in tabularized (1 week, 1 month, few months,
year, few years, 5 years or more) rather than free-form question?
>
> Heh... I actually misunderstood that question as asking about the
> _survey_, not the Git version... I suspect I'm not the only one, so
> please make the question less ambiguous in future versions. :-)
Will fix. It will be "How do you compare the current _Git_ version
with the version from one year ago?".
Putting it just after "21. Did you participate in previous Git User's
Surveys?" probably just increased the confusion, even though below
this question is description what changed in *Git* since year ago.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-03 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-22 18:57 Advertising the Git User's Survey 2011 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-22 19:12 ` Jacob Helwig
2010-09-22 19:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-22 20:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-30 10:51 ` Advertising the Git User's Survey 2010 - report Jakub Narebski
2010-10-01 14:05 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-10-01 23:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-10-02 1:07 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-03 9:46 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-10-02 6:20 ` Advertising the Git User's Survey 2011 Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-10-03 9:20 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-10-03 12:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-10-03 14:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-10-03 18:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-10-03 23:29 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-10-05 3:26 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-10-05 7:01 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010031146.43883.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=stepnem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).