From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: Converting to Git using svn-fe (Was: Speeding up the initial git-svn fetch) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:28:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20101018172810.GA6877@burratino> References: <12137268.486377.1287073355267.JavaMail.root@mail.hq.genarts.com> <20101018051702.GD22376@kytes> <20101018073102.GA3979@burratino> <20101018163836.GI22376@kytes> <20101018165631.GA6718@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Stephen Bash , Matt Stump , git@vger.kernel.org, David Michael Barr , Tomas Carnecky To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 18 19:32:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7tYz-0003Xk-Sy for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:31:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754783Ab0JRRbw (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:31:52 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:42912 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753667Ab0JRRbv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:31:51 -0400 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so67286gwj.19 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GsNZ+IHC5gvTpJmCs7AfzE4l7O0npSccI6S8xijy1ww=; b=Ek3y0BLIP+z/CxwXe9pHIqvXsKx/UdyGHxmz02FxbV+lMFZQ6uSRT4FltYFNCzIOIZ +fYyX46Ms8d2Dtoh503R97yIjn/RvmdUWMXxEBhioj/CXoX97xpTV4WdgSRcaL5MrzVA ffauzTf/RSPYWwW3AE1TBOBw3qnEdlWaghxoM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=cJvr1UjTzN49VRwHhlnAK+ouxDPJM8G1GKNH6Vy1cmW59rmd0lKFneKAIvSscAZ5rQ y+2E4L+ml0B/cJYL8FZMcUqgdXDLJmUk0fVbnlvsroMQrxN/mRJ5fZi/yCt9FjJw2Exe eJQX4SjSAIGU9KJlyQC2i11R3AgfVwYwGhvBY= Received: by 10.103.223.19 with SMTP id a19mr2854478mur.24.1287423110060; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from burratino (adsl-68-255-106-176.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [68.255.106.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm4366732fax.18.2010.10.18.10.31.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:56, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> FWIW I just wanted to make sure people don't forget about the >> incompatible object models. > >> Pulling from svn is a harder problem but luckily the single-upstream >> case is the usual case (so object model mismatches are easier to cope >> with as long as one can find the corresponding svn rev number for a >> given git object easily). > > I think I'm missing something. What do you mean with this? I mean that rejecting a fetch because upstream has weird history would make no one happy.