From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: [PATCH] fix color.pager = false with "git diff" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:02:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20101021150244.GA18426@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 21 17:02:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8wek-0000oS-DQ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:02:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756815Ab0JUPCG (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:02:06 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:41852 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754029Ab0JUPCF (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:02:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 6286 invoked by uid 111); 21 Oct 2010 15:02:02 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:02:02 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:02:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: The color code makes a decision early on about whether to use colors based on the config and whether we are using a pager. For the most part, this works, because if we are using a pager, we will start it more or less immediately. In the case of diff, however, we delay starting the pager in case --exit-code is being used. If this happens, then the color code makes the wrong decision (because it doesn't yet realize we are using a pager), and we need to correct the decision after deciding whether to use a pager. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- Original discussion here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89599 I have mixed feelings on this one. It's kind of a hack. A more elegant solution would be totally rewriting the color code to check for the pager at first output. In favor of this patch: 1. It fixes a real bug. 2. Perfect is the enemy of the good, and I don't care enough about this case to refactor the color code. Against: 1. It does nothing to fix other times when this ordering problem may arise (I don't think there are others, but I didn't check very thoroughly. And of course new ones may appear). 2. The bug was reported over 2 years ago, and hasn't come up since, despite remaining unfixed. Maybe nobody actually cares. builtin/diff.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/builtin/diff.c b/builtin/diff.c index a43d326..cbe15c9 100644 --- a/builtin/diff.c +++ b/builtin/diff.c @@ -318,6 +318,21 @@ int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) setup_pager(); /* + * Special case: we have already examined the config for + * color, but we didn't know at that point whether we were + * going to start a pager. The only case that we care about is + * when we turned on color, but shouldn't have (we will never + * "should have but didn't" because of the pager, since + * a lack of a pager implies either the tty is stdout, in + * which case we do turn on color, or it is not, in which + * case we don't start a pager). + */ + if (DIFF_OPT_TST(&rev.diffopt, COLOR_DIFF) && + pager_in_use() && + !pager_use_color) + DIFF_OPT_CLR(&rev.diffopt, COLOR_DIFF); + + /* * Do we have --cached and not have a pending object, then * default to HEAD by hand. Eek. */ -- 1.7.3.1.235.gdd6c0