From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>,
jrnieder@gmail.com, bebarino@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com
Subject: git merge --abort? [was: Re: [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:11:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010221611.15425.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vaam7rv49.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Friday 22 October 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> writes:
> > Can someone comment on whether "git reset --merge" is a good
> > implementation of "git merge --abort"? If we can get an Ack from
> > someone I'd love to see this implemented.
>
> I think it depends on in what state you started from and how the
> merge operation stopped. If your index was clean, probably yes, but
> "git reset --merge" may not be something you may want to do if the
> merge stopped because you had previously added something.
Does this mean that there are situations where you simply _cannot_ get
back to the pre-merge state (using 'git reset --merge' or otherwise)?
Is this something we should detect and warn about when starting the
merge? Something like:
$ git merge bar
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't merge with and unclean index.
Use -f to force the merge anyway, but then 'git merge --abort' will
lose your staged changes.
Or could we solve it simply by making a backup of the pre-merge index
that can later be restored by 'git merge --abort'?
...Johan
--
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 2:08 [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 01/21] notes.c: Hexify SHA1 in die() message from init_notes() Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 02/21] (trivial) notes.h: Minor documentation fixes to copy_notes() Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 03/21] notes.h: Make default_notes_ref() available in notes API Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 04/21] notes.c: Reorder functions in preparation for next commit Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 05/21] notes.h/c: Clarify the handling of notes objects that are == null_sha1 Johan Herland
2010-10-21 5:12 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-21 13:13 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-21 17:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-22 13:32 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 06/21] notes.h/c: Propagate combine_notes_fn return value to add_note() and beyond Johan Herland
2010-10-21 5:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-21 13:16 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 07/21] (trivial) t3303: Indent with tabs instead of spaces for consistency Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 08/21] notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notes Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 09/21] builtin/notes.c: Split notes ref DWIMmery into a separate function Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 10/21] git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 11/21] builtin/notes.c: Refactor creation of notes commits Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 12/21] git notes merge: Handle real, non-conflicting notes merges Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 13/21] git notes merge: Add automatic conflict resolvers (ours, theirs, union) Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 14/21] Documentation: Preliminary docs on 'git notes merge' Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 15/21] git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 1/2 Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 16/21] git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 2/2 Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 17/21] git notes merge: List conflicting notes in notes merge commit message Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 18/21] git notes merge: --commit should fail if underlying notes ref has moved Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 19/21] git notes merge: Add another auto-resolving strategy: "cat_sort_uniq" Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 20/21] git notes merge: Add testcases for merging notes trees at different fanouts Johan Herland
2010-10-21 2:08 ` [PATCHv4 21/21] Provide 'git notes get-ref' to easily retrieve current notes ref Johan Herland
2010-10-21 21:00 ` [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge Sverre Rabbelier
2010-10-21 23:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-10-21 23:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-22 14:11 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2010-10-22 14:55 ` git merge --abort? [was: Re: [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge] Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-22 15:12 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-22 15:20 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-10-22 15:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-22 15:57 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-10-22 15:41 ` [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge Johan Herland
2010-10-22 15:54 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-10-23 0:47 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-23 1:44 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-10-22 22:28 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-23 1:38 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010221611.15425.johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).