From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git as an sfc member project Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:39:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20101026223925.GA29332@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20101022183027.GA12124@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 27 00:38:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAsAE-0006JV-Bf for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:38:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756735Ab0JZWih (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:38:37 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:55455 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753166Ab0JZWih (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:38:37 -0400 Received: (qmail 8944 invoked by uid 111); 26 Oct 2010 22:38:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (216.239.45.19) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:38:35 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:39:25 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101022183027.GA12124@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > The draft agreement is here: > > http://peff.net/git-sponsorship-agreement.pdf OK, this thread seems to have died, which I'll take to mean that everybody either agrees or doesn't care. So let's do this: 1. There will be a committee of 3-5 Gits who will act as liaisons to the SFC. A simple majority of that committee is required to authorize SFC to do stuff (like disburse money). Existing members can be removed from and new members can be added to the committee by simple majority vote of the existing committee. As for the initial committee, Gitzilla already nominated Junio, Shawn, and me. Those sound like a good start to me (assuming the other two accept). I'm happy to hear other nominations. I think starting with the 3 of us would be fine, too, and we can add people who become interested in the management of git and the sfc (and if there _is_ anybody who is interested now, please speak up and/or nominate yourself; I can think of many people on the list who would be good candidates, but the main issue seems to me that nobody is interested. :) ). 2. We'll give 10% of incoming Git money to the SFC for their operations (where incoming git money is basically SoC money plus any donations SFC collects on our behalf). Unless I hear objections on the list, this is what I'll present to the SFC as our plan. -Peff