From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Documentation: kicking the "reset --hard" habit Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:03:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20101101200333.GG2340@fieldses.org> References: <20101029083516.GA26290@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Matthieu Moy , Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, bebarino@gmail.com, srabbelier@gmail.com, Thomas Rast , Jakub Narebski , Christian Couder To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 01 21:03:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PD0bW-0003Fx-QW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:03:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752702Ab0KAUDi convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:03:38 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:58034 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752909Ab0KAUDg (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:03:36 -0400 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PD0bN-0002Y5-4I; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:03:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 05:25:20PM +0000, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 = Bjarmason wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:55, Matthieu Moy > wrote: >=20 > >> Sadly, at least the user manual change suggested below is probably > >> not suitable, since reset --keep and --merge have not been around > >> since git 1.5.3 days. =C2=A0Ideas for working around that and othe= r > >> comments would be welcome. > > > > Do we really want to keep the user manual compatible with 1.5.3 > > forever? It's nice to keep the user manual usable by slightly outda= ted > > Gits, but 1.5.3 starts being really old, and older docs are still > > available on the web (like > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/v1.5.3.8/git.html )= =2E >=20 > I didn't know we even did this with our user manual. When I read > manuals for version X (e.g. PostgreSQL, Emacs or libc versions) I > fully expect the features described to only work on the documented > version unless otherwise noted. Yeah, previous versions of the user manual are still around if people need them. For a book or an independent website a wider range of versions would make more sense, but for documentation destributed with the git source I think we can afford to be more aggressive. If we think information about old versions is really important maybe someone could find a way to incorporate it in a way that doesn't intrud= e into the main text too much (e.g. footnotes or an appendix.) --b.