From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitrevisions :/search style with other operators Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:08:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20101109160833.GA24975@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <9D675671-693D-4B59-AF2A-0EFE4C537362@sb.org> <7vpqufpr7f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4F75AA0C-B68A-4ABB-B67A-D7F62D989655@sb.org> <20101109051631.GA19867@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v4obqo5dk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Kevin Ballard , Git mailing list To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 09 17:07:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFqjh-00034k-UO for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:07:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752355Ab0KIQHj (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:07:39 -0500 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:47041 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233Ab0KIQHi (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:07:38 -0500 Received: (qmail 7782 invoked by uid 111); 9 Nov 2010 16:07:37 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:07:37 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:08:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v4obqo5dk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:59:03AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > It seems to me the natural way to do that would be to use our existing > > generic "start at this ref and follow some chain" syntax, which is > > ref^{foo}. For example: origin/pu^{:Merge 'kb/blame-author-email'}. > > Yeah, that may make more sense but I think the operation specifier should > be '/', not ':', no? Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote the text above. It should definitely be origin/pu^{/Merge...}. -Peff