From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann Dirson Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #01; Tue, 9) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:35:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20101110203516.GE8911@home.lan> References: <7vbp5ymfyo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Erik Faye-Lund X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 10 21:35:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGHOD-0005kS-SO for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:35:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756172Ab0KJUfZ convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:35:25 -0500 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]:41191 "EHLO smtp5-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755341Ab0KJUfY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:35:24 -0500 Received: from home.lan (unknown [81.57.214.146]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B700D48131; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:35:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from yann by home.lan with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PGHO0-0005TH-9u; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:35:16 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:17:07PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wr= ote: > > * yd/dir-rename (2010-10-29) 5 commits > > =A0- Allow hiding renames of individual files involved in a directo= ry rename. > > =A0- Unified diff output format for bulk moves. > > =A0- Add testcases for the --detect-bulk-moves diffcore flag. > > =A0- Raw diff output format for bulk moves. > > =A0- Introduce bulk-move detection in diffcore. > > >=20 > This series currently breaks the Windows build of 'pu', as we lack > memrchr there. Jonathan Nieder posted a patch > (<20101015051750.GA21830@burratino>) that adds a memrchr > implementation. This should probably either be rebased on top of that > patch, or re-rolled. >=20 > While 'pu' not building on Windows might not be a big deal, it's wort= h > keeping in mind before merging it further. If you plan to re-roll the series as it is, you may want to consider the latest update to the 1st patch in the series. I had not resent the whole series just for that. http://marc.info/?l=3Dgit&m=3D128890797304674 OTOH, you may want to wait for the next iteration, which should be ready by the end of the week.