From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: git describe weird behaviour Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:24:10 -0600 Message-ID: <20101110212410.GA13782@burratino> References: <20101110010016.GC22105@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vaalhhstp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20101110204034.GO22105@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 10 22:24:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGIA4-0006MC-7A for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:24:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756920Ab0KJVYj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:24:39 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:53783 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756598Ab0KJVYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:24:35 -0500 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so728330eye.19 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:24:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=P4xGcDXPleDi0btgvB1k2dthupwFd8PNOzQX2/zjfhw=; b=eDbCLoovwjDNkWy5ZqNTKXtZVUPtzXNhVkc+jg5LDIJswfYqy8i/LAnSyEpd/zPlSh Ulvs3lKwxStFVfWxevmaZGP9H0paOJobLSZhw0FuxW6jG4KTNb2cX8mOgBnR6z6By+7c cLbbAlzCftWOIegEFDEGIumyX3axB3W35d12s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=KeSGxLD2ZDAYLnh9z2jjr1n3hue9d1WU5FolY0QL7UTXQlXckPcktZptJSRcvsU6HH aXgOZ6w/sosmY2fRdzjdFzI8jmqqoJUY8z4zz+kufcDU6AmdOYzMwc53AHpXHdEOn/5N H9YhoQfFVFRWmMvak06k9aQPdtihvQd6SmVtg= Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr8829047wem.14.1289424272848; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from burratino (adsl-68-255-106-176.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [68.255.106.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p4sm773297wer.29.2010.11.10.13.24.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:24:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101110204034.GO22105@genesis.frugalware.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miklos Vajna wrote: > But I think the approach to follow the first parent only would solve the > problem outlined in the commit message of 80dbae0 as well: I think it's > pretty rare to tag a commit in a feature branch, then merge it. Doesn't that happen in linux-2.6 history fairly often (subsystem trees syncing with upstream)?