From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:32:56 -0600 Message-ID: <20101119213256.GA579@burratino> References: <20101118175007.GA26505@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101118184241.GN3693@efreet.light.src> <20101118190414.GA30438@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Jan Hudec , git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 19 22:33:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJYaf-0001WB-4S for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:33:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755442Ab0KSVds (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:33:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:46670 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755373Ab0KSVdr (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:33:47 -0500 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so475066qwd.19 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:33:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5j2unCQHnhQfF0g+qyUy1Yb1RmT2NVhN8fhgBlYjkfQ=; b=gKITLOJaXAnaUCfEc41/z1s0cZWWYhIIhVK1d4uG8oJj1H2vWJ8xjMbG7Hxkq7ZaAt 6s2crJ+GMN+2Ng5DVELoy//ifQ2w+7hrH7k+8uAKDZxWfXET1Pq4ynMWx4hwfU5BwUF/ QghjIdBxOQ4C7v9ruhSpOFj+S3Ch4zCsYrlzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=p/oqwOxoV2qT9Q/T+9DC96JfR9TEHnktLKJQ0HzEFQfpN4UBsgbWieJ78WycEk1iB5 FKU99EYZ1qg4Td/g5QC7O/eFYXtTAqA1HVqiD5AFfg/JqGHxTsb0eGCPHu0q3lBKNT0P jdSpEPSiFdDzsMROeeR0duOwcPc/1Oq7JOlXA= Received: by 10.224.74.18 with SMTP id s18mr474394qaj.327.1290202426588; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from burratino (adsl-68-255-106-176.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.255.106.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14sm1243322qck.29.2010.11.19.13.33.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:33:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jeff King writes: >> it really only makes sense to push from a non-bare repo, > > Why? The repo could itself be a mirror. Jeff seems to have meant When in a non-bare repo, it only makes sense to push. which is to say, push --mirror makes sense from a bare repo but fetch --mirror does not. However, I think you read When pushing, it only makes sense to use a non-bare repo to which a reasonable response is to point out that no, push --mirror makes sense from a bare repo after all. I see no disagreement here. :)