From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:54:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20101119215431.GB19644@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20101118175007.GA26505@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101118184241.GN3693@efreet.light.src> <20101118190414.GA30438@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101119213256.GA579@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Andreas Schwab , Jan Hudec , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 19 22:55:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJYvK-0007fx-CQ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:55:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757286Ab0KSVyg (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:54:36 -0500 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:54599 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757161Ab0KSVyf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:54:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 29161 invoked by uid 111); 19 Nov 2010 21:54:35 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:54:35 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:54:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101119213256.GA579@burratino> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:32:56PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Jeff King writes: > > >> it really only makes sense to push from a non-bare repo, > > > > Why? The repo could itself be a mirror. > > Jeff seems to have meant > > When in a non-bare repo, it only makes sense to push. > > which is to say, push --mirror makes sense from a bare repo but fetch > --mirror does not. However, I think you read Yes, but s/bare/non-bare/ in your statement. :) There is also more to it, see the other mail I just sent. -Peff