Re: [PATCH] logging branch deletion to help recovering from mistakes

["Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:37:39AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> 
> > Yes, you are right.  We should instead let the normal reflog expire
> > action do its work here, and delete the empty log file when it is
> > finally empty.
> > 
> > I guess we also need repack and prune to enumerate these deleted
> > reflogs and retain the objects their records point to.
> 
> Definitely. I sort of assumed all of those things just traversed
> .git/logs blindly without regard to whether there was a ref, which would
> handle this automagically. But maybe that is not the case.

I think those enumerate the logs of refs that are also being
traversed.  Which means we would need to add new logic to enumerate
the deleted reflogs.
 
> Is there a reason to require that each log is specifically tied to a
> ref?

Historical bad assumptions?

I mean, no, there really isn't a good reason that each log is
tied to a ref.  Its probably reasonable to just enumerate the logs
directory separate from the refs directory enumeration.  Its just
some more code.  Right now we discover logs by just relying on the
ref directory traversal code.

-- 
Shawn.