From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jared Hance Subject: Re: [PATCH] imap-send: link against libcrypto for HMAC and others Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:51:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20101208015144.GA4868@localhost.localdomain> References: <7vwro2sd83.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <1290629033-20566-1-git-send-email-flameeyes@gmail.com> <1291613304.3339.12.camel@fixed-disk> <1291613978.4756.157.camel@yamato.local> <7v39qbtoq9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 08 02:52:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQ9CS-0007Sf-3t for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:52:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932160Ab0LHBv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:51:56 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:63362 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932078Ab0LHBvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:51:55 -0500 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so637127qwa.19 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=alYfvt+hJMspY/a8cHYkx6bgWtg8By7gWBhwR2A9L88=; b=bYFjEfpkMHVDvKexBsbRsxRMS93Gz0Ice1FDLBWTKlb2oQaTTaTO4N+ni7Qe46BhSD wlCOFWm7dCoPVHnv6t+qvilItypIMDDap5TcHNqxz6pBH5a3dXCBU4EJVCgyVv83AGU/ 2Axg0Y3Lq4plU8h6fz+FszPEDTj26Xfc2QidY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Z8rUdeVoBr1rzEacnojLhHMVZ142+NCOG54acr+5N5KgpDjIgbp8UxWq0urHd9m93A qbOIoZW+3/JiRjqVGab1arp/UeFG+56/N2N8l8TZ35tSPyUCQu8XIZp/M34OrcGhu4Wk 2+MBSSQlZKoNxW6b2mQf33FrKBTCGnBtTF47k= Received: by 10.224.20.15 with SMTP id d15mr6382407qab.394.1291773114378; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-174-101-219-169.cinci.res.rr.com [174.101.219.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb14sm43901qcb.24.2010.12.07.17.51.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:51:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v39qbtoq9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > You are both correct; the point of NO_OPENSSL is not to link with anything > from openssl suite, so we need a separate mechanism to address this. > > Anders, wouldn't this be a better fix for NO_OPENSSL build, than reverting > a fix for an incorrect ld invocation? Could we get this fixup patch into master? Leaving the original patch in without it doesn't seem like a good idea when it breaks the build.