From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: git format-patch should honor notes
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:50:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012081150.09424.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CFF5CD2.2000009@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Johan Herland venit, vidit, dixit 08.12.2010 11:12:
> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >> Also, in order to be really useful, I would need a place to store
> >> the cover letter also. I was experimenting a while back with a
> >> design for annotating branchnames which "basically" worked but
> >> haven't had time to really implement it. If I remember correctly,
> >> I had to set up some "bogus" refs to keep my notes from being
> >> garbage collected and was still figuring out the best place to put
> >> them. I'll dig it up when I have time to.
> >
> > I believe the last time the issue of adding notes to branch names
> > was discussed, the consensus was that rather than using notes, they
> > could be stored using a custom entry in the config file, e.g.
> >
> > git config branch.mybranch.description "Description of mybranch"
> >
> > I might have misremembered this, though.
>
> They certainly "could". The question whether they "should" depends on
> what they are used for:
>
> - config is neither versioned nor easily shareable; perfect for your
> own scratch notes to go away once work is done
>
> - notes are versioned and can be shared (I don't need to tell
> you...); perfect for longer term annotations you want to keep
>
> Note that "sharing" here includes also pushing to your backup repo
> and cloning around. I'd certainly put patch series cover letters in
> the second category.
True. I was wrong to equate cover letters with local-only branch name
descriptions.
As has been discussed before, you can use notes to store the cover
letter, the question is which SHA-1 to attach it to.
Using a SHA-1 that doesn't exist in the repo (e.g. the SHA-1 of the
branch name) leaves the note vulnerable to 'git notes prune', but maybe
that is an acceptable restriction ('git notes prune' must be manually
invoked in any case). For extra safety, we could add a config option
that refuses 'git notes prune' for a given notes ref, something like:
git config notes.mynotes.refusePrune true
...Johan
--
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 21:53 git format-patch should honor notes Eric Blake
2010-12-07 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-07 22:11 ` Jeff King
2010-12-08 8:20 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-12-08 10:12 ` Johan Herland
2010-12-08 10:24 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-12-08 10:50 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2010-12-08 11:15 ` Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012081150.09424.johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).