From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Enrico Weigelt Subject: Re: Commiting automatically (2) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:33:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20101220073312.GA23482@nibiru.local> References: <7vaak1ftin.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: weigelt@metux.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 20 08:37:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUaJY-0001W2-Rv for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:37:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753683Ab0LTHhm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:37:42 -0500 Received: from caprica.metux.de ([82.165.128.25]:60011 "EHLO mailgate.caprica.metux.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753641Ab0LTHhm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:37:42 -0500 Received: from mailgate.caprica.metux.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBK7X1BI001343 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:33:03 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with UUCP id oBK7Wx07001333 for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:32:59 +0100 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id oBK7XCSK029272 for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:33:12 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Maaartin wrote: > Yes, I wonder why it wasn't already implemented. I do something like > make all; git snapshot; send_the_executable_to_the_customer > which is IMHO needed quite often. Perhaps it's wise to just use a separate repository on the same repository. Maybe make it more convenient using some little shell functions. I'm also using that for backup purposes, where the repo lies outside the to-be-backed-up tree. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------