From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug? in checkout with ambiguous refnames
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:02:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110111180208.GC1833@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvd1v4bmt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:02:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Also, one other question while we are on the subject. I think we all
> > agree that "git checkout $foo" should prefer $foo as a branch. But what
> > about "git checkout -b $branch $start_point"?
>
> That has always been defined as a synonym for
>
> git branch $branch $start_point && git checkout $branch
>
> so $start_point is just a random extended SHA-1 expression.
That's what I would have expected, but I wanted to write a test to make
sure it was the case.
But it's not. Even taking away the die, my second test here fails (built
on top of the three previous commits under discussion):
diff --git a/t/t2019-checkout-amiguous-ref.sh b/t/t2019-checkout-amiguous-ref.sh
index e2b330b..7a6b30b 100755
--- a/t/t2019-checkout-amiguous-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t2019-checkout-amiguous-ref.sh
@@ -50,4 +50,13 @@ test_expect_success VAGUENESS_SUCCESS 'checkout reports switch to detached HEAD'
! grep "^HEAD is now at" stderr
'
+test_expect_success 'new branch from ambiguous start_point works' '
+ git checkout -b newbranch ambiguity
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'checkout chooses tag over branch for start_point' '
+ echo tag >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect file
+'
+
test_done
For bonus fun, doing this:
git branch newbranch ambiguity
git checkout newbranch
_does_ prefer the branch. So it is checkout feeding create_branch() the
modified sha1. I'll see if I can dig further.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 10:46 bug? in checkout with ambiguous refnames Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-07 19:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-07 19:49 ` Jeff King
2011-01-07 19:54 ` Jeff King
2011-01-07 22:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-07 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-11 6:52 ` Jeff King
2011-01-11 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-11 18:02 ` Jeff King [this message]
2011-01-12 1:25 ` Jeff King
2011-01-12 9:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-12 17:27 ` Jeff King
2011-01-11 6:55 ` Jeff King
2011-01-11 19:20 ` Jeff King
2011-01-11 20:00 ` Jeff King
2011-01-08 20:40 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-01-08 21:40 ` Jeff King
2011-01-09 2:43 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-01-09 7:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-09 16:18 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-01-12 9:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-12 17:46 ` Jeff King
2011-01-12 18:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110111180208.GC1833@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).