From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] commit: suggest --amend --reset-author to fix commiter identity Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:39:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20110112183904.GE31747@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1294754860-17701-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> <1294856954-26841-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 12 19:39:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd5bP-00062N-4J for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:39:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755029Ab1ALSjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:39:09 -0500 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:48019 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754828Ab1ALSjH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:39:07 -0500 Received: (qmail 23084 invoked by uid 111); 12 Jan 2011 18:39:06 -0000 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (99.108.226.0) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:39:06 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:39:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294856954-26841-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:29:14PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Since the message advise to fix the configuration first, the advantage > of this command is that it is cut-and-paste ready, while using > --author='...' requires the user to type his name and email a second > time. > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy > --- > Sorry, I did a resend the other day, which was plain wrong (I had the > changes in my tree, but sent before commit--amend-ing). > > This one should be OK. Yeah, this one looks good. Acked-by: Jeff King -Peff