From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
David Barr <david.barr@cordelta.com>,
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Towards a Git-to-SVN bridge
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:22:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110115072211.GB25253@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295074272-19559-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
Hi Ram,
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Over the last couple of days, I've been working on a parser that
> converts a fast-import stream into a SVN dumpfile. So far, it's very
> rough and works minimally for some common fast-import
> commands.
Some early questions:
- what are the design goals? Is this meant to be super fast?
Robust? Simple? Why should I be excited about it?[1]
- what subset of fast-import commands is supported? Is it well
enough defined to make a manpage?
- does this produce v2 or v3 dumpfiles?
- why would I use this instead of git2svn? Does git2svn do anything
this will not eventually be able to do? (Not a trick question ---
I don't have enough experience with git2svn to tell its strengths
and weaknesses.)
> I've decided to try re-implementing fast-export
> to eliminate blob marks
Hopefully "re-implement" means "patch" here. :)
I can comment on the code but it's probably better if I have a sense
of the design first (in any event, thanks for sending it).
Regards,
Jonathan
[1] I found the original svn-fe design interesting because
(1) it reused code from an existing svndump parser, at least in
spirit,
(2) the repo_tree data structure was well fitted to the design
constraints,
(3) the line_buffer input abstraction was oddly satisfying, even
though it does not buy anything obvious out of the box over
direct use of strbuf and stdio;
(4) speed; and, most importantly
(5) the command-line interface was easy to debug, very flexible,
and dead simple.
I find the current svn-fe satisfying in a different way --- a sort of
"line by line" translation between dump formats is becoming possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-15 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-15 6:51 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Towards a Git-to-SVN bridge Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-01-15 6:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] date: Expose the time_to_tm function Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-01-15 6:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] vcs-svn: Start working on the dumpfile producer Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-01-15 7:39 ` Peter Baumann
2011-01-15 8:11 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-01-15 6:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] Build an svn-fi target in contrib/svn-fe Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-01-15 7:22 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2011-01-15 7:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Towards a Git-to-SVN bridge Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110115072211.GB25253@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=david.barr@cordelta.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox