From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: cannot fetch arm git tree Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:57:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20110121135725.GR13235@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110116092315.GA27542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110116110819.GG6917@pengutronix.de> <20110116134248.GD27542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D398C43.1000306@vollmann.ch> <20110121134728.GO14956@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Detlef Vollmann , Jello huang , git@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 21 14:58:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PgHV5-0005IF-Nq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:58:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752854Ab1AUN5x convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:57:53 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:33811 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752733Ab1AUN5w (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:57:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arm.linux.org.uk; s=caramon; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=Ub6QSZOFL4MARSwOjCMsNzMa+0a8V448opBIWSAhinA=; b=V2F/breoBO5Vj3Xcri6GDPLso96CucdUpzTElypC2XEMHejh8EC2sFkGuWm6gu0GOLqkHr9YPmO2YnXQ7mmc6VWbTnhqyCZM5IFsNWw/Q2VWRq5CTdJ0woSkcSAnAaH+wNtlxJpMyhrySgMK8aEpf3ymJCIanGyONIluLw9E1Ug=; Received: from n2100.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgHUU-0007NS-Nb; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:57:27 +0000 Received: from linux by n2100.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PgHUT-0004w1-FZ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:57:25 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110121134728.GO14956@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:47:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Hi Detlef, >=20 > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:38:11PM +0100, Detlef Vollmann wrote: > > On 01/16/11 14:42, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > >Let's say you already have a copy of my tree from a month ago, and= Linus > > >has pulled some work from me into his tree, and repacked his tree = into one > > >single pack file. At the moment, the largest pack file from Linus= is > > >400MB plus a 50MB index. > > > > > >You already have most of the contents of that 400MB pack file, but= if > > >you're missing even _one_ object which is contained within it, git= will > > >have to download the _entire_ 400MB pack file and index file to re= trieve > > >it. > > I thought this has changed with "smart http" in git 1.6.6. > > Am I missing something? > Well, not all http repos offer smart http. E.g. Russell doesn't[1], > probably because the serving machine doesn't have the power to nice > serve a repo via git:// or smart http://. What is smart http? I don't particularly follow git developments.