From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Project- vs. Package-Level Branching in Git
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:42:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110129194258.GE602@nibiru.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3tygt9xmn.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
* Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is only if lib{a,b,c} is _internal_ dependency. In usual case
> project A might depend on library B *to be installed*, but it doesn't
> mean that source code of library B has to be in repository for project
> A. And in usual case when project A depends on library B, it relies
> on library B public stable API (its build system might check if you
> have new enough library B installed). If you depend on specific
> version of library, patched, that is your problem...
To make it more clear:
At buildtime, a _package_ (not project!) "A" requires a already built
and installed package B in some sane place where the toolchain can find it.
On deployment of package "A", it has to be made sure that package "B"
is also deployed (eg. by a dependency-handling package manager).
These are two entirely separate stages in a software's lifecycle.
Buildtime and deployment dependencies may be different (even deployment
and runtime deps may differ).
> In the case of internal dependency, where you co-develop both project
> A and library B, it makes most sense to have separate repositories for
> A and for B, and tie them up using submodules or subtree merge.
I, personally, wouldn't use submodules - too complicated. Instead have
just one tree per package(-variant) and keep these completely separate.
> > I understand that Git was designed with a specific feature set in
> > mind -- to manage Linux kernel development -- and as such isn't
> > going to satisfy everyone. But I'm having trouble figuring out how
> > to integrate it as the SCM in my projects, which aren't organized
> > any differently than any other projects I've seen.
>
> Well, you are braindamaged by your SCM ;-) ... just kidding.
>
> Take a look how LibreOffice (Go-OOo), KDE, GNOME, GNU SourceMage Linux
> distribution organize their repositories -- all of them are highly
> modular / componentized.
Well, I wouldn't say LO is really modularized, yet. (but we're
working on that ...).
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-29 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 19:38 Project- vs. Package-Level Branching in Git Thomas Hauk
2011-01-27 20:09 ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-01-27 20:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-01-27 23:22 ` Thomas Hauk
2011-01-28 8:30 ` Jay Soffian
2011-01-28 9:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-01-29 19:42 ` Enrico Weigelt [this message]
2011-01-29 23:28 ` David Aguilar
2011-01-30 19:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-31 0:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-01-31 8:56 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-28 16:20 ` Marc Branchaud
2011-01-28 16:39 ` in-gitvger
2011-01-28 21:43 ` Eugene Sajine
2011-01-29 19:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-29 19:08 ` Enrico Weigelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110129194258.GE602@nibiru.local \
--to=weigelt@metux.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).