From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@horizon.com
Subject: Re: [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become
Date: 1 Feb 2011 21:29:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202022909.30644.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
For what it's worth, I don't see the "cleanup".
If it significantly reduced the size of the largest directory,
that would be a win. But moving everything into src/ doesn't
do that.
If there's a way to divide the source into cohesive subunits, that
would be great. A programmer could ignore whole subdirectories
when working on something.
But just moving the whole existing pile into a subdirectory "because
everyone else does it" is not a reason; that's superstition.
Having to type "src/" a lot more often is definitely a downside.
Heck, that's one thing I actively dislike about GNU autoconf conventions.
If there's a compelling reason to change, could someone please describe it?
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 2:29 George Spelvin [this message]
2011-02-02 8:31 ` [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-02 20:01 ` Pascal Obry
2011-02-03 6:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-03 8:09 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-03 18:01 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-02-03 18:46 ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 21:42 ` Hilco Wijbenga
2011-02-04 2:06 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-04 8:30 ` Tor Arntsen
2011-02-04 10:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-02-04 11:17 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-04 18:15 ` [1.8.0] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-02-04 22:47 ` Drew Northup
2011-02-05 15:11 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31 5:53 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2011, #06; Sun, 30) Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 17:05 ` Planning for 1.7.5 and 1.8.0 Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 20:28 ` [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 21:08 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-01-31 21:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:00 ` Jeff King
2011-01-31 21:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 22:36 ` João P. Sampaio
2011-01-31 22:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 23:12 ` Jeff King
2011-02-01 0:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 1:48 ` Jeff King
2011-02-01 4:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 12:42 ` Thomas Rast
2011-02-01 11:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 11:22 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 13:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 16:02 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-01 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-01 0:35 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-01 1:53 ` Jeff King
2011-02-01 1:00 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-01 1:57 ` Jeff King
2011-02-01 7:24 ` Jay Soffian
2011-02-01 14:42 ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-02-05 3:21 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110202022909.30644.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).