From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:26:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102042326.08607.j6t@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4C5EBC.2090100@web.de>
On Freitag, 4. Februar 2011, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> In commits be254a0ea9 and 7dce19d374 the handling of the new fetch options
> "--[no-]recurse-submodules" had been added to git-pull.sh. This was not
> necessary because all options to "git fetch" are passed to it and handled
> there, so lets remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
> ---
>
> I noticed this while implementing the on-demand recursive fetch.
>
> git-pull.sh | 10 ++--------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-pull.sh b/git-pull.sh
> index eb87f49..20a3bbe 100755
> --- a/git-pull.sh
> +++ b/git-pull.sh
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test -z "$(git ls-files -u)" || die_conflict
> test -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" && die_merge
>
> strategy_args= diffstat= no_commit= squash= no_ff= ff_only=
> -log_arg= verbosity= progress= recurse_submodules=
> +log_arg= verbosity= progress=
> merge_args=
> curr_branch=$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)
> curr_branch_short="${curr_branch#refs/heads/}"
> @@ -105,12 +105,6 @@ do
> --no-r|--no-re|--no-reb|--no-reba|--no-rebas|--no-rebase)
> rebase=false
> ;;
> - --recurse-submodules)
> - recurse_submodules=--recurse-submodules
> - ;;
> - --no-recurse-submodules)
> - recurse_submodules=--no-recurse-submodules
> - ;;
> --d|--dr|--dry|--dry-|--dry-r|--dry-ru|--dry-run)
> dry_run=--dry-run
> ;;
> @@ -223,7 +217,7 @@ test true = "$rebase" && {
> done
> }
> orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD)
> -git fetch $verbosity $progress $dry_run $recurse_submodules
> --update-head-ok "$@" || exit 1
>> +git fetch $verbosity $progress $dry_run
> --update-head-ok "$@" || exit 1 test -z "$dry_run" || exit 0
>
> curr_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD)
Huh? What will, for example,
git pull --recurse-submodules --no-ff origin
do before and after your patch? Doesn't your patch force users to
write --[no-]recurse-submodules last?
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 20:17 [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch Jens Lehmann
2011-02-04 22:26 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2011-02-05 11:26 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-06 21:59 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 22:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-06 22:57 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 7:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-07 19:27 ` [PATCH v2] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 22:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Jens Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102042326.08607.j6t@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).