git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: RFD: Handling case-colliding filenames on case-insensitive filesystems
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:58:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102240158.24363.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vfwre8sax.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wednesday 23 February 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think two things are sensible to do, are relatively low hanging fruits,
> and are of low risk:
> 
>  - break checkout on such a tree on incapable filesystems; and

Wouldn't that be a regression from the current state (where the poor user in 
a case-insensitive worktree can at least "git rm" the offending files, and 
keep working without assistance from a case-sensitive worktree)?

What about giving a warning on checkout, instead, explaining the problem, 
and advising that - for now - the user can remove the offending files with 
"git rm"?

>  - per project configuration (or attribute given to paths underneath a
>    particular directory) that forbids or warns addition of case colliding
>    paths to the index; enforce it at write_index() codepath; and
> 
>  - if we choose to just warn in the second item above instead of
> downright forbidding, barf in cache_tree_update() codepath when the per
> project configuration (or attribute) triggers upon case colliding paths,
> to prevent a commit from being made.

I support making this a per-project configuration that will trigger at tree-
creation (i.e. commit) time. I would even argue that the default should be 
to warn about (though maybe not refuse) case-colliding filenames, since they 
are either (a) directly harmful for cross-platform projects, or (b) probably 
unwanted in most projects anyway.

Having a per-project configuration sure beats trying to solve the problem in 
a hook script (using "pre-commit" introduces the logistical problem making 
sure everybody installs/enables the hook, whereas using "update" requires 
(precious) server runtime, triggers too late in the developer's workflow 
(forcing developer to amend/rebase), and probably confuses newbie developers 
as well).

> I think "warn at add time, fail at write-tree time" is more preferrable,
> as it might be more convenient if you can add hello.c while you still
> have HELLO.c in the index as long as you do not forget to remove HELLO.c
> from the index before making your next commit.

Agreed.


...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-23 17:11 RFD: Handling case-colliding filenames on case-insensitive filesystems Johan Herland
2011-02-23 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-23 19:01   ` Shawn Pearce
2011-02-23 19:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-24  0:58       ` Johan Herland [this message]
2011-02-24  1:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-24  8:50           ` Johan Herland
2011-02-23 19:07 ` Jay Soffian
2011-02-23 19:17   ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-23 22:52   ` Marc Branchaud
2011-02-23 23:09     ` Greg Troxel
2011-02-24  0:30 ` Johan Herland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102240158.24363.johan@herland.net \
    --to=johan@herland.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).