From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: ab/i18n (What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2011, #05; Wed, 23)) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:14:14 -0600 Message-ID: <20110224031414.GC7970@elie> References: <7v1v2y5o3p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110223234828.GA7286@elie> <7vd3mi44gx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 24 04:14:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsReu-00027V-JW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:14:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932163Ab1BXDOV convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:14:21 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:61029 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932071Ab1BXDOU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:14:20 -0500 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so97235qwd.19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ybh2zA3EPpDvlL7DTlWDob4rv0YWJnzeqOnTMvgGecE=; b=GsOOJyaAo4dH2K3aQfDaaQatynTFzd5RN3oUjRiDBh28iH0jSR50ZL6MTHfMFLaUfF OZpDUjqvaUCOwxItXqdrFEHtn4CSBINHJf1EVeq3IKJZzEg0N1igcbvyzw6DkU+39Fu3 +j1ITQfVxoQk0n43wZ/u2rrVaOpRuyYNn23Ow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=R4kfYLE+l0w4uLQt8oXrGZ5Zx7lOT87/kWw5RN4nPptm2rvdIT/4RHpO601tzvMUZS R7GnhY2nePrPn2dlxckE3Tay982kEvHht/5rVwjFzN9Mh7R53sgx/tBKRlbPtbGcXLLz tYoVUW2kXmrWpmOd6zA1xad2JQcTEr8I9v14A= Received: by 10.224.28.129 with SMTP id m1mr247856qac.87.1298517259394; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from elie (adsl-69-209-53-52.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [69.209.53.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm6007531qck.12.2011.02.23.19.14.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:14:18 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: > Anyway, to be blunt I really don't see the point of fiddling around > with this bit so much. Whether it's a `"GETTEXT POISON"` constant or > `rot13(msgid)` the same tests will fail. Because with rot13 you can decode the message and find the problematic code? > If someone else wants to do the work I don't care. I just think > there's more important things to worry about. I already wrote a patch. I imagine you don't intend it this way, but I keep on hearing "we shouldn't do what you've already done. It's too much trouble. You wasted your time."