From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Subject: Re: Why doesn't git commit -a track new files Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:47:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20110224174740.5b1aec4f@glyph> References: <20110224112246.3f811ac2@glyph> <4D6672F7.4020101@drmicha.warpmail.net> <4D668181.404@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 24 17:48:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PseMb-0004Gs-Mj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:48:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756457Ab1BXQsD convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:48:03 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44535 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756435Ab1BXQsB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:48:01 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PseM9-0003yh-0n for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:47:57 +0100 Received: from miun108-177.dynamic.miun.se ([193.10.108.177]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:47:57 +0100 Received: from netuse by miun108-177.dynamic.miun.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:47:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: miun108-177.dynamic.miun.se X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2011-02-24 Michael J Gruber wrote: > > git status && behappy && git commit -A >=20 > That may not give the full picture of untracked stuff in subdirs. May I ask why not? AFAIK git status outputs staged and untracked stuff. > > git commit -A && look at status $EDITOR && behapy && save >=20 > Yes, I even mentioned that, but you cut it. Bad bad boy! ;) >=20 > >> Also, "-A" supports a very "un-gitty" way of using git. This makes= it > >> unlikely that someone cares to implement it... I think it *can* be used in an appropriate manner. BTW: Why isn't commit -a =C2=BBun-gitty=C2=AB? Marco