From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: how to list commits on branch since last merge Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:12:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20110308171251.GA1823@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <4D75ED72.8030203@drmicha.warpmail.net> <4D75FB7B.70403@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Michael J Gruber , git To: Jay Soffian X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 08 18:19:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px0ZR-0000ZK-IJ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:19:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755081Ab1CHRTf (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:19:35 -0500 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:35075 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754924Ab1CHRTe (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:19:34 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 398 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:19:34 EST Received: (qmail 859 invoked by uid 107); 8 Mar 2011 17:13:20 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:13:20 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:12:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:11:16AM -0500, Jay Soffian wrote: > Going back to my original picture, I mean commit m: > > o---o---x---o---... foo > \ \ > o---o---m---o---... bar > > merge-base foo bar gives me x; to get m I then need to grep the output > of rev-list --parents for x. Isn't the merge the first commit in bar that is not in foo? IOW: git rev-list foo..bar | tail -n 1 ? I admit it's not particularly elegant, though. And I haven't given enough thought to decide whether that happens to work in your case, or if it is more general. :) -Peff