From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: GSoC resumable clone Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:48:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20110311154822.GA30605@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20110311153752.GA30329@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Alexander Miseler , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Ilari Liusvaara , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jonathan Nieder , Jens Lehmann , Christian Couder , Thomas Rast , git , Pranav Ravichandran To: Shawn Pearce X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 11 16:48:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Py4Zs-0005uN-TK for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:48:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755744Ab1CKPsZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:48:25 -0500 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:48348 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754512Ab1CKPsX (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:48:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 8605 invoked by uid 107); 11 Mar 2011 15:48:55 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:48:55 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:48:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:41:14AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > I think there is room for both ideas. The cached bundle idea is not just > > "here, download this bundle first". It is "here, download this _other > > thing_ first, which might be a bundle, another git repo, a torrent, > > etc". > > Fair enough. Though I wouldn't limit this to bundles. Instead I would > suggest supporting any valid Git URLs, and then extend our URL syntax > to support bundles over http://, rsync://, and torrent. Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that it was limited to bundles. It would support arbitrary URLs or schemes. See this thread for some past discussion: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/164700 > If we support any URL and don't assume the URL is a bundle, you can > point traffic at kernel.org to for example grab Linus' primary > repository first, even if he doesn't have a bundle. Exactly. -Peff