From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, David Barr <david.barr@cordelta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Portability: returning void
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:29:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110330002921.GC14578@elie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110330001653.GA1161@sigill.intra.peff.net>
(-cc: Michael, to stop spamming a kind bug reporter :))
Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:49:55PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> | 19424 18:31:25 <... nanosleep resumed> NULL) = 0
>> | 19424 18:31:25 close(1) = 0
>> | 19424 18:31:25 close(2) = 0
>> | 19424 18:31:25 exit_group(0) = ?
>> | 19422 18:31:25 <... wait4 resumed> 0x7fff65d1ee6c, 0, NULL) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted)
>> | 19422 18:31:25 --- SIGTERM (Terminated) @ 0 (0) ---
>>
>> The first sleep wakes up and dies. The corresponding subshell
>> wakes up, reaps the child, and finally accepts SIGTERM.
>
> Hrm. That's different than what happens on my system. On my system, the
> bash process is _already_ dead during the whole procedure, and it is
> just the stray sleeps that keep prove waiting.
>
> Maybe different bash versions? Mine is 4.1.5(1) (from debian unstable,
> bash_4.1-3).
$ dpkg-query -W perl bash
bash 4.1-3
perl 5.10.1-18
Same version here, but I had modified the test a little. *tries the
stock version again* Same behavior still. FWIW I am using the patch
below[1] and invoking the tests as
strace -f -o trace.out prove --exec=bash -v t0081-line-buffer.sh :: -v -i
> Did you try my 5>/dev/null patch? With it, I get no hang at all.
Haven't tried it yet but will try.
I really don't like that as a long-term solution. Yes, it gets prove
to stop hanging, but meanwhile we have no control over the child
processes we have spawned. I'd rather just drop the tests.
---
diff --git a/t/t0081-line-buffer.sh b/t/t0081-line-buffer.sh
index 1dbe1c9..054bffa 100755
--- a/t/t0081-line-buffer.sh
+++ b/t/t0081-line-buffer.sh
@@ -49,13 +49,14 @@ long_read_test () {
{
{
generate_tens_of_lines $tens_of_lines "$line" &&
- sleep 100
+ sleep 15
} >input &
} &&
test-line-buffer input <<-EOF >output &&
binary $readsize
copy $copysize
EOF
+ pstree -p $! &&
kill $! &&
test_line_count = $lines output &&
tail -n 1 <output >actual &&
@@ -84,12 +85,13 @@ test_expect_success PIPE '0-length read, no input available' '
rm -f input &&
mkfifo input &&
{
- sleep 100 >input &
+ sleep 15 >input &
} &&
test-line-buffer input <<-\EOF >actual &&
binary 0
copy 0
EOF
+ pstree -p $! &&
kill $! &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
@@ -112,13 +114,14 @@ test_expect_success PIPE '1-byte read, no input available' '
{
printf "%s" a &&
printf "%s" b &&
- sleep 100
+ sleep 15
} >input &
} &&
test-line-buffer input <<-\EOF >actual &&
binary 1
copy 1
EOF
+ pstree -p $! &&
kill $! &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 17:31 [PATCH] Portability: returning void Michael Witten
2011-03-29 20:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-29 22:16 ` Jeff King
2011-03-29 22:36 ` Jeff King
2011-03-29 23:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 0:16 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 0:29 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2011-03-30 3:30 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 3:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 4:13 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 6:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-03-30 8:16 ` [PATCH/RFC svn-fe] tests: introduce helper to fill a pipe in the background Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 8:41 ` [PATCH] Portability: returning void Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 12:40 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 18:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 4:41 ` [PULL svn-fe] " Jonathan Nieder
2011-03-30 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-30 0:42 ` [PATCH] " Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110330002921.GC14578@elie \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=david.barr@cordelta.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).