From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Portability: returning void Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20110330124019.GA28062@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <71372d7d-dd08-4945-a8bc-c7b981c09fb2-mfwitten@gmail.com> <20110329200230.GA377@elie> <20110329221652.GB23510@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110329234955.GB14578@elie> <20110330001653.GA1161@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110330002921.GC14578@elie> <20110330033017.GA18157@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110330035733.GA2793@elie> <20110330041339.GA26281@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110330084148.GE2793@elie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, David Barr , Johannes Sixt To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 30 14:40:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4uhM-0004fr-8n for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:40:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754767Ab1C3Mk1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:40:27 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:59802 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751681Ab1C3Mk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:40:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 9213 invoked by uid 107); 30 Mar 2011 12:41:06 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:41:06 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:40:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110330084148.GE2793@elie> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:41:48AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I don't think any of them is worth the fuss. So how about this? > > -- 8< -- > Subject: Revert "t0081 (line-buffer): add buffering tests" That's OK with me. Should it drop test-line-buffer, too? -Peff