From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: chris <jugg@hotmail.com>
Cc: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] remote: disallow some nonsensical option combinations
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:52:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110330195252.GA30624@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110330195139.GA814@sigill.intra.peff.net>
It doesn't make sense to use "-m" on a mirror, since "-m"
sets up the HEAD symref in the remotes namespace, but with
mirror, we are by definition not using a remotes namespace.
Similarly, it does not make much sense to specify refspecs
with --mirror. For a mirror you plan to push to, those
refspecs will be ignored. For a mirror you are fetching
from, there is no point in mirroring, since the refspec
specifies everything you want to grab.
There is one case where "--mirror -t <X>" would be useful.
Because <X> is used as-is in the refspec, and because we
append it to to refs/, you could mirror a subset of the
hierarchy by doing:
git remote add --mirror -t 'tags/*'
But using anything besides a single branch as an argument to
"-t" is not documented and only happens to work, so closing
it off is not a serious regression.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
builtin/remote.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/remote.c b/builtin/remote.c
index b71ecd2..2e25c6a 100644
--- a/builtin/remote.c
+++ b/builtin/remote.c
@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ static int add(int argc, const char **argv)
if (argc < 2)
usage_with_options(builtin_remote_add_usage, options);
+ if (mirror && master)
+ die("specifying a master branch makes no sense with --mirror");
+ if (mirror && track.nr)
+ die("specifying branches to track makes no sense with --mirror");
+
name = argv[0];
url = argv[1];
--
1.7.4.2.8.g3ccd6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-30 2:27 checkout new branch tracks wrong remote (bug?) chris
2011-03-30 14:59 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] better "remote add --mirror" semantics Jeff King
2011-03-30 19:52 ` Jeff King [this message]
2011-03-30 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] remote: separate the concept of push and fetch mirrors Jeff King
2011-03-30 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-30 20:57 ` Jeff King
2011-03-30 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-31 2:44 ` chris
2011-03-31 2:50 ` chris
2011-03-31 4:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-31 12:59 ` chris
2011-03-30 19:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] remote: deprecate --mirror Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110330195252.GA30624@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jugg@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).