From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git gc: Speed it up by 18% via faster hash comparisons
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:10:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427231012.GA17807@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427225114.GA16765@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> I suspect 'git fsck' got faster as well, but i have not measured that.
It got faster a bit:
#
# Before:
#
$ perf stat --sync --repeat 5 ./git fsck >/dev/null
Performance counter stats for './git fsck' (5 runs):
32011.163574 task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.08% )
46 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 2.77% )
0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 0.00% )
60,279 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec ( +- 12.21% )
102,597,312,322 cycles # 3.205 GHz ( +- 0.08% )
27,303,254,781 stalled-cycles # 26.61% of all cycles are idle ( +- 2.51% )
152,359,589,474 instructions # 1.49 insns per cycle
# 0.18 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.03% )
13,225,673,730 branches # 413.158 M/sec ( +- 0.06% )
1,226,749,384 branch-misses # 9.28% of all branches ( +- 0.08% )
32.083499222 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.07% )
#
# After:
#
Performance counter stats for './git fsck' (5 runs):
31605.868825 task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.08% )
42 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec ( +- 3.92% )
0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec ( +-100.00% )
62,979 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec ( +- 14.72% )
101,297,181,916 cycles # 3.205 GHz ( +- 0.08% )
27,173,614,721 stalled-cycles # 26.83% of all cycles are idle ( +- 0.49% )
155,074,859,385 instructions # 1.53 insns per cycle
# 0.18 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.01% )
14,132,018,558 branches # 447.133 M/sec ( +- 0.02% )
1,207,054,592 branch-misses # 8.54% of all branches ( +- 0.03% )
31.675135938 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.08% )
so there's a +1.3% speedup.
But git fsck stalls are dominated by libz and other external libraries:
# Events: 30K stalled-cycles
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ....... ..................... ............................
#
36.13% git libz.so.1.2.5 [.] 0x90be
18.27% git libc-2.13.90.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back
13.68% git libcrypto.so.1.0.0d [.] sha1_block_data_order
5.85% git libz.so.1.2.5 [.] inflate
4.69% git git [.] lookup_object
4.58% git libz.so.1.2.5 [.] adler32
4.30% git libz.so.1.2.5 [.] 0xc280
2.19% git libc-2.13.90.so [.] _int_malloc
So those dominate execution time.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 22:51 [PATCH] git gc: Speed it up by 18% via faster hash comparisons Ingo Molnar
2011-04-27 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-04-27 23:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-28 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-28 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:32 ` Dmitry Potapov
2011-04-27 23:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-28 0:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-04-28 8:18 ` Bernhard R. Link
2011-04-28 9:42 ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-04-28 9:55 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 20:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-28 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:17 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:50 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 10:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-28 10:19 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 10:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-28 11:59 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 12:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-28 12:36 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-28 12:40 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 15:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 16:00 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 20:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 7:05 ` Alex Riesen
2011-04-29 16:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-28 12:16 ` Tor Arntsen
2011-04-28 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-28 12:17 ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-04-28 12:28 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 12:02 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-04-28 12:18 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-04-28 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-28 16:36 ` Dmitry Potapov
2011-04-28 8:52 ` Dmitry Potapov
2011-04-28 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:31 ` Dmitry Potapov
2011-04-28 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-28 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110427231012.GA17807@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).