From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Aman Gupta <themastermind1@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] merge-one-file and GIT_WORK_TREE
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:38:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110428223822.GA16004@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
[argh, resend, actually remembering to cc the list this time]
At GitHub, we're using read-tree, merge-index, and merge-one-file to do
trivial content-level merges from bare repositories (without having to
check out the entire repository contents each time).
However, we noticed a bug in git-merge-one-file when used with
GIT_WORK_TREE; it can silently create bogus results that ignore the
"theirs" side of files needing content-level merging.
The problem is that merge-one-file simply assumes it is in the root of
the working tree without any checking. The only two places we use
merge-one-file in git itself are in the octopus and resolve strategies.
I think normal use is fine, because "git merge" will have changed to the
toplevel of the worktree already.
So I doubt anybody else is being affected by this. But we do expose the
commands for general use, with no disclaimer or check on the working
tree status or location. And the resulting bogus merge is a nasty
surprise.
[1/2]: add tests for merge-index / merge-one-file
[2/2]: merge-one-file: fix broken merges with GIT_WORK_TREE
-Peff
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 22:38 Jeff King [this message]
2011-04-28 22:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] add tests for merge-index / merge-one-file Jeff King
2011-04-29 6:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-04-29 6:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-28 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge-one-file: fix broken merges with GIT_WORK_TREE Jeff King
2011-04-29 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] merge-one-file and GIT_WORK_TREE Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110428223822.GA16004@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=themastermind1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).