From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: [PATCH 0/3] blame --line-porcelain Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 09:31:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20110509133153.GA10998@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20110503090351.GA27862@elie> <4DC1CE16.5030808@dailyvoid.com> <7vsjsuc704.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110506205441.GA20182@elie> <20110506205851.GB20182@elie> <20110506214801.GA17848@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110506221300.GB17848@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7voc3fxy6b.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110506222951.GA24474@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 15:32:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJQZ8-0000cL-Lf for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 15:32:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752881Ab1EINb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 09:31:57 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:39011 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752680Ab1EINb4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 09:31:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 8995 invoked by uid 107); 9 May 2011 13:33:52 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:33:52 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 09 May 2011 09:31:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110506222951.GA24474@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:29:51PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > Non-repetition was quite deliberate, as the reader was expected to have > > memory proportional to the number of lines in the range, but I agree it is > > not friendly for quick and dirty hack. > > > > You should be able to add a command line option that disables the early > > return at the beginning of emit_one_suspect_detail() with a 5-6 lines of > > patch. > > I tried that, and it is slightly more involved. You also need to break a > multi-line run of lines that blame to a single suspect into its > constituent lines. I am 75% of the way to such a patch if you are > interested. It's not a lot of code, but it takes some refactoring of > emit_porcelain. It turned out to not be too bad. Here's the series. [1/3]: add tests for various blame formats [2/3]: blame: refactor porcelain output [3/3]: blame: add --line-porcelain output format -Peff