From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:59:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110511125900.GH2676@elie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305100822-20470-8-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Introduce three new command-line options: --continue, --abort, and
> --skip resembling the correspoding options in "rebase -i". For now,
> just parse the options into the replay_opts structure, making sure
> that two of them are not specified together. They will actually be
> implemented later in the series.
I'd suggest squashing this patch with the next one. If a "git
cherry-pick" accepting an --abort option that does not do anything
leaked into the wild, that would not be a good outcome.
> --- a/builtin/revert.c
> +++ b/builtin/revert.c
> @@ -145,7 +153,47 @@ static void parse_args(int argc, const char **argv, struct replay_opts *opts)
> opts->xopts_nr = xopts_nr;
> opts->xopts_alloc = xopts_alloc;
>
> - if (opts->commit_argc < 2)
> + /* Check for incompatible command line arguments */
> + if (opts->abort_oper || opts->skip_oper || opts->continue_oper) {
> + char *this_oper;
> + if (opts->abort_oper) {
> + this_oper = "--abort";
> + die_opt_incompatible(me, this_oper,
> + "--skip", opts->skip_oper,
> + NULL);
> + die_opt_incompatible(me, this_oper,
> + "--continue", opts->continue_oper,
> + NULL);
What happened to
...(me, "--abort",
"--skip", opts->skip,
"--continue", opts->continue);
? I also wonder if there should not be a function to deal with
mutually incompatible options:
va_start(ap, commandname);
while ((arg1 = va_arg(ap, const char *))) {
int set = va_arg(ap, int);
if (set)
break;
}
while ((arg2 = va_arg(ap, const char *))) {
int set = va_arg(ap, int);
if (set)
die(arg1 and arg2 are incompatible);
}
va_end(ap);
> + die_opt_incompatible(me, this_oper,
> + "--no-commit", opts->no_commit,
[...]
Seems reasonable. A part of me would want to accept such options and
only error out if the saved state indicates that they are different
from the options supplied before, so if a person has
alias applycommits = git cherry-pick --no-commit
then "applycommits --continue" could work without trouble, but
that's probably overegineering.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-11 8:00 [PATCH 0/8] Sequencer Foundations Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] revert: Improve error handling by cascading errors upwards Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 9:59 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 10:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-19 10:39 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
[not found] ` <20110519091831.GA28723@ramkum.desktop.amazon.com>
2011-05-19 18:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-20 6:39 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] revert: Make "commit" and "me" local variables Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 10:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 10:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-13 21:40 ` Daniel Barkalow
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] revert: Introduce a struct to parse command-line options into Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 11:24 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 9:32 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-13 10:07 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 10:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] revert: Separate cmdline argument handling from the functional code Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 11:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 9:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-13 9:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-13 9:44 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] revert: Catch incompatible command-line options early Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 12:06 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 10:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] revert: Introduce head, todo, done files to persist state Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 12:47 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 10:21 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] revert: Implement parsing --continue, --abort and --skip Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 12:59 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2011-05-13 9:16 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-13 9:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] revert: Implement --abort processing Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-11 13:14 ` [PATCH 0/8] Sequencer Foundations Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-12 8:19 ` Christian Couder
2011-05-12 8:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-12 11:44 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-13 9:11 ` Christian Couder
2011-05-13 10:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-16 4:14 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110511125900.GH2676@elie \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).