Re: [PATCH 3/3] format-patch: preserve subject newlines with -k

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:19:52PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> > >  	pp_title_line(CMIT_FMT_EMAIL, &msg, &sb, subject_start, extra_headers,
> > > -		      encoding, need_8bit_cte);
> > > +		      encoding, need_8bit_cte, 0);
> > 
> > I do not appreciate a single-bit tweak as separate parameter to a
> > function.  Back when pp_title_line() had only "do we need 8-bit cte", it
> > was Ok, but now that you are adding another bit, could we make it an
> > "unsigned flag"?
> 
> Actually, I wonder if we can refactor to just pass the pretty_context to
> pp_title_line. Let me see what I can do.

It ends up being a lot of lines changed, but I think the result is more
readable. Replace my 3/3 with (1/5 and 2/5 are the same as before):

  [3/5]: pretty: add pp_commit_easy function for simple callers
  [4/5]: clean up calling conventions for pretty.c functions
  [5/5]: format-patch: preserve subject newlines with -k

-Peff