From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: learn --discard subcommand Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 13:58:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20110529185821.GA13751@elie> References: <1306551495-26685-1-git-send-email-martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> <20110528230844.GA31498@elie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Tim Mazid To: Martin von Zweigbergk X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 29 20:58:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQlC7-0004K9-J5 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 20:58:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755661Ab1E2S6a (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2011 14:58:30 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:47654 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754844Ab1E2S63 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2011 14:58:29 -0400 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so1253782ywe.19 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:58:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=7mm+6QoSqzb5hUtKVMWcGi/FuoPMkZJqXS9ylW9Q2LM=; b=V0oyg7Ht7pto+bfoemG3XUDzPk1a3Msu4+OvCZOmsDcoTKar+zuNK30KeuRN0lbPtl e69pHI7/u8UsVThfJnhCxusisxI5x91iKJn3JtFUxf/8lhiP5yQIVDuPufHSP5bYm//V dzfj6MooHc3RRCx3czBE5lWAJJH/8u8bZCY+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=E7DGI/2KtSe/oBkd2Tm17FYJKQ64gnpR8jInJ4Nr0sSwF88Hrfh7G9GLbQndxQrHpo vUdJOb5fKnuPgOxpdSyu3WtmSl/7VWZ1DBLMoFkUuDSUHXigK9ydgXsC3w5aOVq1dd7Z pfhNk3ZIO8kUYURYrMY0cyEz80QDJ51VshpZs= Received: by 10.236.78.99 with SMTP id f63mr4545281yhe.518.1306695509186; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elie (adsl-69-209-65-98.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [69.209.65.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e48sm1959979yhk.42.2011.05.29.11.58.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 May 2011 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > I intended --discard to be used _instead_ of --abort. Do you think it > makes more sense to have it as an option to --abort or was it just > that the word "subcommand" confused you? I meant it as "subcommand of > git rebase". I agree that --abort-keeping-head is nicer than --abort --keep-head. The latter was just a little easier to document. Sorry, I'm terrible at names. --forget, --discard, and --done have the same problem of making the reader wonder what is going to be forgotten and what remembered.