From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Q: how can i find the upstream merge point of a commit? Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:27:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20110608142757.GG30752@elte.hu> References: <20110608093648.GA19038@elte.hu> <20110608203433.61e02ad8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110608125242.GA32745@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Stephen Rothwell , git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 08 16:28:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUJk5-00033q-Bt for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:28:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753404Ab1FHO2P (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:28:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39074 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755977Ab1FHO2N (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:28:13 -0400 Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14]) by mx2.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1QUJjj-0003zu-Fd from ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:28:07 +0200 Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 4323A3E2517; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:27:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Received-SPF: neutral (mx2.mail.elte.hu: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu; X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > Heya, > > [+Peff, Duy, who seemed interested in this] > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 14:52, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So it would be nice to have more separation for remotes - right now > > they do not sit still in their sandboxes! :-) > > Sounds like the "tags should go in their own namespaces in git 1.8.0" > [0] discussion? :) > > [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165799/focus=165837 Cool, i like banging on open doors! :-) Thanks, Ingo