From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Doesn't disambiguate between 'external command failed' and 'command not found' Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:00:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20110706180026.GC17978@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1309884564.18513.12.camel@umgah> <4E137701.1020007@elegosoft.com> <20110705231604.GC12085@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4E144B55.8020907@elegosoft.com> <20110706175803.GB17978@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Alex Vandiver , Sverre Rabbelier To: Michael Schubert X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 06 20:00:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeWOn-00028h-Go for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:00:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752639Ab1GFSA2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:00:28 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:60908 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282Ab1GFSA2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:00:28 -0400 Received: (qmail 23222 invoked by uid 107); 6 Jul 2011 18:00:49 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:00:49 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:00:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110706175803.GB17978@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:58:03PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > Like this? I've replaced "Check the #!-line of the git-%s script." with > > "Maybe git-%s is broken?" to be less technical and specific.. > > Yeah, looks good to me (unless somebody wants to do something more > elaborate to catch other exec problems, but I personally don't think > it's worth the effort). One minor nit, though. I haven't been paying attention to the progress of the gettext topics, but should this message: > +static const char bad_interpreter_advice[] = > + "'%s' appears to be a git command, but we were not\n" > + "able to execute it. Maybe git-%s is broken?"; Actually be inside _() for gettext? -Peff