From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange O(N^3) behavior in "git filter-branch"
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:20:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110715212059.GA2117@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vlivz1inu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:51:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But I think the replace-object codepath should be optimized to realize
> there is no funky replacement (which _is_ a rare configuration) going on
> much early so that it does not incur that much overhead you observed. IOW,
> I tend to agree with your 3. below.
> [...]
> > 3. Optimize the specific case where there is no refs/replace
> > directory--if this directory is missing, then defer populating the loose
> > refs cache in the hope that it will never be needed.
It already tries to do so. It looks like it calls:
for_each_replace_ref(...)
which calls:
do_for_each_ref("refs/replace", ...)
which reads _every_ loose ref, regardless of the prefix we have given
it. So the optimization should go into the for_each_ref code, which
should avoid looking at parts of the hierarchy that are just going to be
culled, no?
And then we would see immediately that there is no refs/replace at all,
and quit early. And as a bonus, things like "for_each_tag_ref" would get
faster in a repository with many branches, too.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-14 7:16 Strange O(N^3) behavior in "git filter-branch" Michael Haggerty
2011-07-14 9:24 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-15 9:19 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-15 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-15 21:20 ` Jeff King [this message]
2011-07-16 5:26 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-17 13:24 ` Drew Northup
2011-07-18 8:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-07-18 16:01 ` Drew Northup
2011-08-03 13:33 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-08-03 19:37 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110715212059.GA2117@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).