From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] config: Introduce functions to write non-standard file Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:57:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20110719215739.GA8613@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1311095876-3098-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <1311095876-3098-3-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <20110719195504.GA3957@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vipqy7yiy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List , Jonathan Nieder , Christian Couder , Daniel Barkalow To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 19 23:57:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjIIX-0007C5-0e for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:57:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751092Ab1GSV5n (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:57:43 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:38741 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952Ab1GSV5n (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:57:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 2640 invoked by uid 107); 19 Jul 2011 21:58:10 -0000 Received: from m-0-33.docsis.hbci.com (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (64.213.220.33) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:58:10 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:57:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vipqy7yiy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:26:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > Is there a need for this "config_exclusive_filename" hackery at all? > > > > I was thinking the result would look more like: > > ... > > Exactly my thought. I think I suggested the same to Ramkumar earlier and > he said he will re-roll but perhaps this is a series before that exchange. This one is incrementally better than the initial one, but I still think it doesn't go far enough. -Peff