From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Possibly solved invalid free() in git-remote-http from Git 1.7.2.1 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:33:44 -0600 Message-ID: <20110802033344.GA17494@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20110801180018.GA10636@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110802105124.000021c3@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git Mailing List To: Tay Ray Chuan X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 02 05:34:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo5kv-0002WY-ML for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 05:34:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753154Ab1HBDdt (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:33:49 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:47884 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968Ab1HBDds (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:33:48 -0400 Received: (qmail 25660 invoked by uid 107); 2 Aug 2011 03:34:20 -0000 Received: from S010690840de80b38.ss.shawcable.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (70.64.172.81) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:34:20 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:33:44 -0600 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110802105124.000021c3@unknown> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0800, Tay Ray Chuan wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:00:19 -0600 > Jeff King wrote: > > Hmm. The memory management in the function seems weird to me. > > How about this? Yes, that fixes all of the oddities I found (I assume you looked and agreed with me that they were wrong). -Peff