From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Questions for "Git User's Survey 2011"
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:37:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108021537.51651.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s2CWvzKyBAskVRq6Vte-CyCKwxBCZbSw_mbp=4a6ngCOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> 2011/7/25 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
> > I am planning doing annual Git User's Survey, and I'd like to ask for
> > feedback.
>
> > === 16. Which of the following Git features do you use? ===
> > (multiple choice, with other)
[...]
> > + interactive commit / per-hunk comitting / partial commit
[...]
> > + Other, please specify
> >
> > NOTES:
> > ^^^^^^
> > The problem is come up not with exhaustive list of features: there are
> > too many of them to list. The problem is coming up with list of
> > important and used enough often features.
> >
> > So: what features should be included in this list? What features
> > should be removed from above list of answers?
>
> *staging*! I have suggested this multiple times, it should be here this one!
>
> - stage add / partial commit / interactive commit / per-hunk comitting
> (e.g. git add -u/-i/-p)
> + stage / partial or interactive commits (e.g. git add -u/-i/-p, git
> diff --cached)
Well, it is there... sort of. I can certainly extend this answer.
> > === 19. Overall, how happy are you with Git? ===
> > (single choice)
> >
> > * unhappy
> > * not so happy
> > * happy
> > * very happy
> > * completely ecstatic
> >
> > NOTES:
> > ^^^^^^
> > I'm not sure if this question is at all useful.
> >
> > There is also problem, that the current wording is considered biased
> > by some, but on the other hand changing wording of answers would make
> > it impossible to compare it to answers from previous surveys...
>
> What wording would you use?
I think I'll keep what we used before.
> > === 20. In your opinion, which areas in Git need improvement? ===
> > Please state your preference.
> > (matrix)
> >
> > Columns: don't need / a little / some / much
> > + user-interface
> > + documentation
> > + performance
> > + more features
> > + tools (e.g. GUI)
> > + localization (translation)
> >
> > NOTES:
> > ^^^^^^
> > Are there any general areas that are missing from this list?
> > What are they?
>
> IDE integration, portability?
Portability, certainly.
IDE integration is a bit out of scope, as it is not strictly about Git
itself, but about Git "ecosystem".
As I wrote in separate email, I am thinking about adding a new question:
21. In your opinion, what Git tools are needed, and which need improvements?
> > == About this survey. Open forum. ==
> >
> > === 26. How did you hear about this Git User's Survey? ===
> > (single choice, with other)
> >
> > * git mailing list
> > * git-related mailing list (e.g. msysGit, Git for Human Beings)
> > * mailing list or forum of some project
> > * #git IRC channel topic
> > * announcement on IRC channel
> > * git homepage
> > * git wiki
> > * git hosting site (or blog related to such site)
> > * software-related web site
> > * news or social news site (e.g. Digg, Reddit)
> > * blog (or blog planet)
> > * other kind of web site
> > * Twitter or other microblogging platform
> >
> > * other - please specify
> >
> > NOTES:
> > ^^^^^^
> > This list would of course be updated to reflect the list of (planned)
> > announcement channels.
> >
> > There of course will be announcement on Git Mailing List, and perhaps
> > also on msysGit list / Google Group, and on Git For Human Beings
> > Google Group (if it exists). I'll announce it on #git, and ask op to
> > put short announcement in channel description, and I can announce it
> > on other IRC channels. I would add announcement to main page of Git
> > Wiki, and as Git Homepage administrator to put announcement about Git
> > User's Survey.
> >
> > I usually tried to contact administrators of git hosting sites,
> > including git.kernel.org, repo.or.cz, GitHub, Gitorious, Assembla,
> > Codebase and Unfuddle, asking them to put announcement about
> > Git User's Survey either somewhere on the site, or in their blog
> > (if there is any). What git hosting sites it is worth to ask?
>
> Google+ (maybe facebook).
They are not git hosting sites ;-)
Anyway, on Google+ there are 36 people who have me in their circles,
I have 28 followers on Twitter. Identi.ca, Plurk, Facebook - here
I don't have or almost don't have "friends"/"subscribers"/"fans".
That's not much, so please: forward / share.
> > I would like to have announcement of Git User's Survey 2010 at
> > LWN.net, but this would need to be send at least two weeks in advance,
> > if I remember correctly. Is it worth it? What other news site should
> > I (or you) send announcement to?
> >
> > If you can Digg / Reddit announcment on some site, please do. I can
> > announce Git User's Survey 2-1- at Twitter, Identi.ca and Plurk, but I
> > don't have wide area of followers. So please RT.
>
> I can post it on reddit :)
Thanks in advance.
> > Should we contact some bloggers (besides asking Junio to put
> > announcement on his blog) to post an anouncement? Which bloggers
> > would respond positively (perhaps Linus...)?
>
> I can post it on gitlog. It looks like there are now many people checking it.
Thanks in advance, again.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 20:33 [RFC] Questions for "Git User's Survey 2011" Jakub Narebski
2011-07-25 21:58 ` Phil Hord
2011-07-26 10:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-07-26 12:14 ` Phil Hord
2011-07-31 13:37 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-08-01 20:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-09-03 8:45 ` David Aguilar
2011-09-03 9:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-09-03 23:41 ` David Aguilar
2011-07-31 13:53 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-08-02 13:37 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2011-08-01 23:43 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-02 11:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-08-02 18:52 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-08-03 11:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-08-03 16:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-08-03 17:40 ` Jakub Narębski
2011-09-03 12:58 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-09-03 15:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-09-14 16:14 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-09-14 17:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-09-19 17:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-09-22 22:45 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-23 8:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-23 9:47 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-24 13:23 ` Michael J Gruber
2012-09-24 14:31 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-24 15:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-09-24 16:11 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-24 16:18 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-09-24 16:23 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-24 19:35 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-09-24 19:43 ` Jakub Narębski
2012-09-25 6:17 ` Matthieu Moy
[not found] ` <CANQwDweD-OSDKkA9P1FPr4jhvv2su5W86J+P8BRV8MmEBgC8BA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-25 6:57 ` Jakub Narębski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108021537.51651.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).